Maritime Human Rights
& Assurance

Independent, evidence-led support for complex maritime incidents and claims.

Delivered in partnership with Human Rights at Sea International (HRASi), this capability provides independent investigation and human rights assurance aligned to the needs of P&I Clubs, their Members, and claims stakeholders.

We provide rapid, deployable support in high-risk and high-scrutiny maritime scenarios, with outputs designed to withstand claims handling, arbitration, litigation, and regulatory review.

THE ASSURANCE SHIFT

Built on an Established Joint Capability

Assure Integrity already supports HRASi as a core delivery partner, particularly across:

  • Investigative Delivery
  • Structured Analysis
  • Evidence Review
  • Methodology and Framework Development

This is not a separate service. It is the extension of an established joint capability into claims-related scenarios, where independent, evidence-led clarity is required.

Where This Fits in Practice

This support is most relevant in complex, sensitive incidents, including:

Criminalisation of Seafarers
Harassment, Abuse, or Welfare Concerns
Abandonment and MLC-related Issues
Fatalities, Disappearances, or Serious Crew Harm

These situations typically involve

Significant Reputational Exposure
Competing Stakeholder Positions (Members, Seafarers, Legal Representatives)
Fragmented, Incomplete, or Contested Evidence
Cross-Jurisdictional Complexity
Pressure to Establish Facts without Disrupting Ongoing Claims Handling

What We Provide

Independent, Evidence-Led Fact-Finding Aligned to Best Practice
Structured Investigative and Analytical Support
Evidential Reconstruction Where Timelines or Accounts are Disputed or Incomplete

Clear, defensible outputs suitable for

Claims Determination
Arbitration and Litigation
Regulatory and Stakeholder Scrutiny
Revenue protected through fraud and loss prevention
Investigations delivered across multiple sectors
In high-scrutiny, multi-jurisdiction environments

How We Work Alongside Existing Claims Handling

Our role is to complement, not replace existing correspondents, legal advisors, and claims handlers.

We are typically engaged where:

Accounts Between Parties are Conflicting or Contested

Exposure is Criminal, Regulatory, or Reputational

A Matter is Escalating or Likely to Become Contentious

Jurisdictional or Stakeholder Complexity Delays Clarity

There is a Need to Reconstruct Events from Evidence Such As:

  • Correspondance
  • Statements
  • Reports
  • Imagery and Documentation

Support can Scale From:

  • Desktop Advisory Input
  • Evidential Gap Analysis and Timeline Reconstruction
  • Structured Investigative Planning
  • Targeted Investigative Support (where required)

Specialist Investigation & Maritime Capability

Assure Integrity’s contribution is strengthened through access to a highly experienced investigative and maritime network, combining:

  • Specialist investigation capability in:
    • Complex casework
    • Maritime incidents
    • Evidential reconstruction and cold case review
  • UK-trained Senior Investigating Officer (SIO) and Cold Case Reviewing Officer-level expertise
  • Experienced Crime Scene Investigators (CSI) with maritime operational exposure
  • Advanced analytical capability for large, complex evidence sets
  • Senior maritime technical expertise, including:
    • Marine accident investigation
    • ISM auditing
    • Technical assurance

This enables a combined approach across:

  • Human rights and stakeholder-sensitive investigation
  • Serious incident investigative methodology
  • Forensic awareness and evidential integrity
  • Maritime technical analysis
Cargo ship out at sea with a substantial amount of cargo on-board

Why This Matters

This combined capability is particularly valuable where there is a need to:

We are typically engaged where:

Establish What Has Occurred in Uncertain or Contested Circumstances

Maintain Evidential Integrity From the Outset

Understand the Interaction Between Human, Operational, and Technical Factors

Present a Clear, Neutral, and Defensible Factual Position

Neutrality & Credibility

Our role is deliberately structured to:

Remain independent and non-adversarial

Focus on fact establishment, not advocacy

Avoid taking a Member or seafarer-side position

Provide a trusted evidential basis for all stakeholders

Value Delivered

Stronger, defensible claims decisions through evidence-led outputs

Reduced reputational and regulatory risk

Independent credibility in high-scrutiny environments

Improved clarity in complex, multi-jurisdictional cases

Reduced escalation through early factual establishment

Global & Jurisdictional Experience

Work is supported across:

  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • South and Southeast Asia
  • UK and Europe
  • Other sensitive and complex operating environments

Engagement Model

Aligned with the HRASi approach, engagement is:

  • Flexible and case-specific
  • Proportionate to risk and complexity

This can include:

  • Day-rate investigative or advisory support
  • Scoped or fixed-fee reviews
  • Capped fee arrangements
  • Agreed parameters prior to deployment

When maritime incidents become complex, contested, or high-risk, independent clarity matters.